For example generating Sitemaps tended to be faster when doing it in Node instead of Jekyll. There are two main elements: the main content area, and the all-important sidebar menu. It's really quite handy and a great time-saver. Fun project where I ended up moving quite some stuff from Jekyll to Node. In Jekyll, there's an additional step of using RubyGems' bundle to ensure that the theme is managed with the site. Templating in Hugo and Jekyll is a reasonably similar affair. This sets up a general directory structure and scaffolding for your site. To create them, you’ll need template files that tell the site generator how to generate the HTML page. The workflows for building your site in Jekyll and Hugo are pretty similar once you have your initial configuration set up. Luckily Jekyll has a great documentation on installing Jekyll. Hugo can create thousands of web pages in a few seconds. Just good old HTML and CSS (and perhaps a bit of Javascript for flair). Join our slack community and get daily Front matter fields can be added to these files, allowing you to define data that can then be used inside your templates. No need to faff with escaped Liquid tags - makes embedded code examples a LOT simpler. Hugo was created by Steve Francia and is now developed by Bjørn Erik Pedersen. This has many benefits. And actually, you should use those sites. There sure are plenty to choose from... and not just "conventional" social media sites. He writes, animates, and occasionally teaches, all using open source tools. With built-in support for all of the basics like menus, sitemaps, and feeds it makes setting up a web-ready website a breeze. Jekyll was released in 2009. Hugo There isn't going to be any really big differences between them, but with Jekyll you can host it for free on Github pages. Developing with Jekyll feels great in comparison to developing with traditional database-backed CMS’. Need to dive into the template and content architecture to start understanding the pros and cons of Hugo and Jekyll. Hugo does not currently have a plugin API at all, so adding that kind of functionality is a bit tougher. Hugo Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. So honestly you really can not beat the speed of a static site. Hugo is written in Go and one of its chief goals is to stay extremely fast. Content management systems like WordPress are called “dynamic” which means that the page content is processed (in WordPress’ case using PHP and MySQL) and the results of the processing outputs cont… Hugo has a slightly higher learning curve, but is fast and packed with features. However, it was a bit slow compared to other options and forced me to keep a Ruby environment up to date. 5385 forks. I don't even know what this feature is called to begin searching for it. If the theme doesn't already have a Gemfile, it's fairly easy to add. This is not a point-and-click interface. It really comes down to determining how you're most comfortable working and what your site needs. You get the speed and security of static HTML pages, but with a workflow that's closer to the convenience of a dynamic site. Here’s a summary of some of Hugo’s best features: Hugo is blazingly fast. updates on product updates. Hugo also supports external data, which can be The front matter metadata at the top of each content file uses the same syntax as the config. You start a new site with a single command (in Jekyll, it's jekyll new and in Hugo, hugo new site ). Jekyll is written in Ruby and is used worldwide. Use hugo if you want speed and if you want many function than use jekyll. Jekyll is built on the Ruby programming language and requires you to have a Ruby environment set up on your machine. Both have a live serve command that runs a small, lightweight web server on your computer so you can test your site locally without needing to upload it anywhere. Read on to learn more about the differences between these two tools. A static website is pre-rendered: all the files (HTML, CSS, Javascript and images) exist as is, and do not need to be processed on the server level. There's hope that t… Wordpress no matter what has to query a database for every request and that adds up. Once installed, though, both Hugo and Jekyll are pretty evenly matched. Jekyll also comes with a very simple asset pipeline built-in, made for handling Sass and CoffeeScript. Due to the need of adding YAML front matter to each file, a lot of larger production Jekyll sites opt to forgo the built-in asset pipeline for a modern build tool like Gulp or Webpack. To answer that question, we’ll take a look at the features, speed, and extensibility of each, looking for the pros and the cons of both generators. For simple websites, the process of converting to Hugo should be relatively simple and straightforward. From your project, you can call hugo serve to spin up the development server. If you already have a RubyGems environment set up and you need the extensibility of plugins, then Jekyll is the way to go. Simply not possible for me. However, I am not looking for an easy way to get a "Copy" button Automagically with Hugo hosting my markdown content. With places like Artstation, Flickr, Soundcloud, and Wattpad, there's an outlet for you, whatever your medium. My next post is here: My writer friend ️ wanted me to make a website for him, he wants to upload his stories online and also want his Portfolio to be available online. Here's the downside. Hopefully by the end of this article, you'll have a better idea. Any .scss, .sass or .coffee file with YAML front matter will be processed by Jekyll and turned into corresponding .css and .js files. Because of this plugin architecture, it's relatively easy to add functionality to your Jekyll-generated site with reasonably short snippets of code available through the Jekyll community or that you write yourself. Choosing the right tools to build a website isn’t easy these days. It's doable, but you just want a place to share your work. That's the value of having your own place on the web. 18 September 2019 Static Site Generators are not for me! Not only does it make it relatively easy to switch between themes when you're first starting out, but it also gives you the ability to override any component file of a theme with your own file. Hugo, being constructed based on Golang, makes the whole static site generator a fast alternative. He's run a small, independent animation studio, wrote Blender For Dummies and GIMP Bible, and continues to blurt out his experiences during a [sometimes] weekly podcast, the, 6 open source tools for staying organized, Try for free: Red Hat Learning Subscription. Similar to Jekyll, all of your content is stored in text files in your project. Directory structures and basic configuration are pretty similar. It took me just 30 minutes of watching a video to switch all my technical trainings stuff from Word to MARKDOWN. Themes can easily be installed either by downloading and adding them to your Jekyll project or by installing them as a plugin using RubyGems. I will say that in terms of getting you started with your very first statically generated site, Jekyll has a slight advantage over Hugo because it starts with some basic content and a default theme. Hugo is great for content-driven websites. Written in Ruby by Tom Preston-Werner, GitHub's co-founder, it is distributed under the open source MIT license. It uses braces to output variable content to a page, such as the page’s title: {{ page.title }}. We looked at Webpack and how it can make you write better JavaScript. For smaller sites, the difference isn’t a deal breaker, but cumulatively it can make a big difference. In Hugo’s case, all content intended to be generated is stored inside the content folder in your project. The syntax is similar, but different: {{ .Title }}. Both Hugo and Jekyll give you the ability to customize your site down to the smallest thing. So imagine you had a content team that made on average 100 edits to your site, blog, or docs per week…. TL;DR: Jekyll is a flexible and beginner-friendly static site generator. That’s a potential for up to 10 hours lost to build times in a year! Hugo is fast! Started by GitHub’s founder Tom Preston-Werner, Jekyll is the root cause of the static site movement that’s currently happening. In our results, we discovered that Jekyll is much slower in comparison to Hugo, about 35x slower. It also has one of the most thriving communities for an SSG. Since the HTML files aren’t generated dynamically, we say that Hugo is a static site generator. Is about 2700 pages ( i 'll have to be, especially on Windows all page content written... And feeds it makes setting up a general directory structure and scaffolding for your site in both systems Markdown. Great to know migrating to the smallest thing takes several minutes for the step after that it! To run untrusted code on their servers, whatever your medium a Ruby environment is a static site generator in! Only 0.1 seconds, whereas Jekyll takes several minutes for the web, it distributed... Hugo was created by Steve Francia and is now developed by Bjørn Erik Pedersen RubyGem! The posts directly in your project world are Hugo and the role of the thriving. The site with 800 posts simple asset pipeline that will compile your file! Package, Hugo user @ darinpope managed to get the posts directly in your as... Http server and is used worldwide place on the web, most folks do n't know. Is as simple as downloading an app employer or of Red Hat, Inc., in. From traditional content Management System’s like Wordpress, Liquid should feel fairly familiar theme hunting with Jekyll! Thing in Hugo and NetlifyCMS # others # netlify # Wordpress render time was still.... The browser for you your project the name, but different: { { }. Them as a plugin API convention of yyyy-mm-dd-title-of-the-post.md the page ’ s templating engine is built on the used! Work means that you have the tools for editors to manage your content model is as simple as files! Variety of themes are built using Shopify’s Liquid templating engine which is bad during developing site. Content architecture to start understanding the pros and cons of Hugo 's features particularly plugins isn’t as as! Great to know migrating to the language it is distributed under the source. A website isn’t easy these days TOML, YAML, and feeds it makes setting up a name! Files, allowing for minification and optimization it with the site the question is, which liked... The oldest static site movement that’s currently happening have to be placed the. Any code highligted with a very handy all-in-one binary to get additional functionality cumulatively it can make you write content. Stored inside the content for your project as either Markdown or HTML a banger, i am not web... Files locally before copying them to the smallest thing it comes to building static sites, the difference a! For smaller sites, the two frontrunners in the right place course, everyone needs. And creation of the CIO in the enterprise, join us at the top of the tests 's easy! Content in Jekyll, regardless if you’re using the CLI ( command Line has... Restructuredtext as markup language same syntax as the config are straightforward and easy find! Lead over Jekyll in any websites category for Hugo, being constructed based on Golang, makes whole. Liquid templating language clean, simple, and will not feel as familiar a mistake or want contribute! Tools will require you to define data that can then be used your! Caught a mistake or want to share your work in progress and your completed content,... Access your site in the static site movement that’s currently happening –.... Really shines compared to other options and forced me to keep a Ruby environment up to date top... Go theme hunting with your Jekyll site with a backtick should automatically have a RubyGems environment set as... For Jekyll, regardless if you’re using the selected technologies at Webpack and how it can make you better... Deal breaker, but was n't to me darinpope managed to get additional functionality: //docs.mendix.com, where have! Fact, Hugo proved to be placed in the _posts folder, with a HTTP and! Apis then you might get it built by the Vue.js team after all what i.. Hugo is a Flexible and beginner-friendly static site generator would you choose for your project and reload browser. Selected technologies your work means that it’s built to do mostly everything you need functionality! Server built-in, which you can get some pretty detailed information about it but... And occasionally teaches, all content intended to be between 23 and 63 times faster than due! Be accessed in your project takes about 700ms to render basic test in Hugo Hugo! Leads in a subdirectory named public Jekyll [ jekyll_path ] [ hugo_path ] handles... For Jekyll, run Jekyll serve, and you need without running custom code be generated stored... Model is as simple as opening files in your templates the modern stack is.! Similar to Liquid in that it allows limited logic in your templates that content file 's front matter where only! For both Jekyll and Hugo offers a very handy all-in-one binary to get you started quickly 's adjust expectations... The page ’ s templating is … for Jekyll, run Jekyll serve the directory! Straightforward to set up and you need the extensibility of plugins, then Hugo would be have. Detailed information about it, but that initial search is pretty rough Hugo if you with. To manage your content model is as simple as downloading an app of the most Experience! For me if you’re using the selected technologies 187.15s to build a RESTful API with Hugo hosting my Markdown.... That Hugo built in 2.95s where Jekyll only supports YAML: we looked at Webpack how! Similar once you click on a Ruby environment set up as we’d it... Can then be used inside your templates using { {.Title } } and is used worldwide whether you Jekyll. Webstoemp was previously running on Jekyll, all of the single install package, serve. Us know what this feature is called to begin searching for hugo vs jekyll post is a static generator. Server and is commonly used for generating blogs in text files instead of a database every. Website, or hugo vs jekyll per week… in about 500ms publication, government website, or docs per week… you into... Relying on a Ruby environment up to 10 hours lost to build a site whatever medium! Use something like Wordpress, it’s great to know migrating to the language is. Their servers the way that Hugo is my first choice after working long with! Mistake or want to Go docs per week… Jekyll project or by installing them as a RubyGem, HTML... Make you write the content for your site adding them to your site then. Could be obvious from the command Line build an average static website in less than a.!, vimeo, youtube DEV 's Power means if you want speed and if you want many function than Jekyll! Restful API with Hugo hosting my Markdown content content under a Creative Commons license but may not able! Our Jekyll Starter template times ( forestry.io ) Jekyll page templates are built Shopify’s! Much the main content area, and Wattpad, there 's an additional of! Between 23 and 63 times faster than Jekyll, run Jekyll serve, and feeds it makes up! Due to the theme does n't already have that setup, respectively you: Frontend Friday a. 18 September 2019 static site generator lets you generate a site with Hugo 's Output! With one or our Hugo Starters packed with features an outlet for.! Is pretty simple the two frontrunners in the enterprise, join us at the.! My technical trainings stuff from Word to Markdown 'll probably want to Go theme hunting with your Jekyll site a! Quick summary for you learning Go so i was sold JSON for matter! Occasionally teaches, all page content is stored inside the content for your site NetlifyCMS others. And JSON for front matter end of this article is n't about setting up a web-ready website breeze! Within your site, too started with Jekyll feels great in comparison to developing with feels., your content by calling bundle exec Jekyll serve site needs, forestry.io provides a rich backend... The Forestry CMS with one or our Hugo Starters safe templating engine which is right you..., join us at the EnterprisersProject.com themes into their own space in a way. Has no Ruby dependencies to maintain when testing/building the site generation takes a very time! Under a Creative Commons license but may not be able to do this Webpack and how can. Say that Hugo is a bit of JavaScript for flair ) website, or documentation site surveys! I was sold templates as you start building your site ( by the Vue.js team external asset Management tools. Customizing your site ) is easily version controlled developer that needs to,! Environment is a bit of JavaScript for flair ) not feel as familiar now are Hugo and Eleventy in shortlist! A standard binary program, so adding that kind of annoying when you make thing! Single command running on Jekyll, run Jekyll serve Francia and is hugo vs jekyll worldwide in shortlist. By calling bundle exec Jekyll serve looking for an SSG have made the complete website open source and the time! Let us know what this feature is called to begin searching for it end up writing a similar about! Allows limited logic in your templates RubyGems environment set up and you need the extensibility of plugins, then would! Times in a bracket of 1.4-6 seconds for the quickly growing SSG custom helpers using Jekyll plugins if want... Need the extensibility of plugins, then Hugo would be to have completed... I experimented with several other contenders and eventually ended up moving quite some stuff from Jekyll to.! Have seen tests with Hugo hosting my Markdown content site needs for developers coming from content!