In order for fusion to occur, you need a temperature of at least 100,000,000 degrees Celsius. to heat water and produce electricity via a dynamo. What fuel is used in nuclear power plants? 2195 views The reactor is under vacuum, explains David Hill, director of a fusion test reactor at General Atomics in San … It turns out that the most tightly bound atomic nuclei are around the size of iron, which has 26 protons in the nucleus. 0 0. If reactors were safe, nuclear industries would not demand government-guaranteed, accident-liability protection, as a condition for their generating electricity. Since the fission of thorium doesn't produce plutonium (one of the elements used in nuclear weapons) as a byproduct, uranium, the dual-purpose nuclear fuel took precedence. You can check out the difference between the two in this infographic below. On Earth, the most likely fusion reaction is Deuterium–Tritium reaction. say that fusion is always more powerful than fission; it depends on which fusion reaction we are talking about and what "more powerful" means. Using deuterium and tritium as nuclear fuel in the nuclear fusion reaction will generate heat, light, helium, and some neutrons (a small amount of radioactive metal). – but they consume way more power than they produce, which basically defeats the purpose of generating power using fusion. How is nuclear energy obtained? One reason fusion is considered safer because it doesn't require any (or very little, depending on the design) radioactive material as fuel. Nuclear fusion reactors don't use a radioactive source to power them, they run on hydrogen. It's not the same thing as radioactivity. Nuclear fission is a nuclear reaction in which the nucleus of an atom splits into smaller parts (lighter nuclei). I came away from the event intrigued and optimistic about the potential of fusion power - but also a little skeptical of the promises being made by its proponents. One of the biggest reasons why we haven’t been able to harness power from fusion is that its energy requirements are unbelievably, terribly high. Fusion only produces more energy than it consumes in small nuclei (in stars, Hydrogen & its isotopes fusing into Helium). The hydrogen can accumulate and explode, not like a fission reactor but enough to kill people and destroy the building. Scientists continue to work on controlling nuclear fusion in an effort to make a fusion reactor to produce electricity. Fusion reactions are being studied by scientists, but are difficult to sustain for long periods of time because of the tremendous amount of pressure and temperature needed to join the nuclei together. My friend's concerns over the safety of nuclear fusion is just down to the fact that the word "nuclear" is in the name. Fusion on several counts. Because nuclear fusion has no chain reaction involved. The main downside is that we have not yet produced a practical fusion reactor for everyday use. It should be noted that experimental fusion reactors do exist – and work! Cheaper, safer alternatives than nuclear fission. In fusion the positive nuclei of two atoms must be brought together close enough for the nuclear force to be stronger than the repulsive electromagnetic force; to achieve that massive amounts of energy go into heating the nuclei until they have enough energy to fuse. There are a couple of problems with fission reactors. While a 1,000 MW coal-fired power plant requires 2.7 million tons of coal per year, a fusion plant of the kind envisioned for the second half of this century will only require 250 kilos of fuel per year, half of it deuterium, half of it tritium. Nuclear fusion is the reaction that powers the Sun. Fusion could also result in catastrophic reactions, but our attempts at fusion reactors have so far been fairly safe. Fusion power is a proposed form of power generation that would generate electricity by using heat from nuclear fusion reactions.In a fusion process, two lighter atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus, while releasing energy. Fission reactors also pose quite a hefty problem of disposal of toxic wastes. The only byproduct of nuclear fusion is helium, which is safe and non toxic. Nuclear fusion is safer than nuclear fission. This in turn should mean that its far safer than fission. I think Marty McFly said it best in Back to the Future in regards to plutonium: ITER ("The Way" in Latin) is one of the most ambitious energy projects in the world today. Nuclear fusion is a process in which atomic nuclei are fused together to form heavier nuclei. This leads me on to my second point, conventional nuclear power, or nuclear fission isn't that dangerous. The steam is used to spin a turbine to produce carbon-free electricity. If this external energy were removed, the … Fission more stable the Fusion. This isn’t a chemical reaction like … Sarah Harman | U.S. Department of Energy Fission. The new, safer nuclear reactors that might help stop climate change. Firstly, nuclear fusion requires less fuel than fission. So the amount that can be released in a most catastrophic imaginable accident is huge. Its major by-product is helium: an inert, non-toxic gas. It is also safer than fission, and would produce no “greenhouse gasses” such as carbon dioxide. Fission and fusion are two physical processes that produce massive amounts of energy from atoms. Fusion is the same process that powers the sun and stars. If a nuclear reaction produces nuclei that are more tightly bound than the originals then energy will be produced by fusion, and for fission the opposite is true. There’s no doubt that fusion is better in terms of the inputs required. It doesn’t require the use of uranium. From sodium-cooled fission to advanced fusion, a fresh generation of projects hopes to rekindle trust in nuclear energy. The only bi-product of the process is helium, meaning that no greenhouse gases are released into the atmosphere. One reason fusion is considered safer because it doesn't require any (or very little, depending on the design) radioactive material as fuel. Extremely high temperatures (on the order of 1.5 x 10 7 °C) can force nuclei together so the strong nuclear force can bond them. Fusion is the least developed of these but it has the potential to provide a virtually inexhaustible source of energy. Secondly, why is fission easier than Fusion? So the amount that can be released in a most catastrophic imaginable accident is huge. 2 1Deuterium + 3 1Tritium = 42He + 10n + 17.6 MeV[Image:Fissio… The new, safer nuclear reactors that might help stop climate change. It involves smashing hydrogen atoms together under extraordinary temperature and pressure, fusing them together to form helium atoms and releasing a large amount of energy and radioactive waste. 1 decade ago. … Some scientists believe there are opportunities with such a power source since fusion creates less radioactive material than fission and has a nearly unlimited fuel supply. Uranium and plutonium are most commonly used for fission reactions in nuclear power reactors because they are easy to initiate and control. Can you list some of the pros and cons of nuclear energy. I mean… I understand that fusion will be more efficient, eliminate radioactive waste, and replace fission power, but overall, the waste (if properly controlled and managed) is actually fairly small for a fission nuclear power plant. That’s mostly been accomplished throughout history by burning carbon-based material like wood, coal and gas—or by harnessing power from the sun, wind, and water. In addition note that the results of fusion reactions are invariably lighter … In southern France, 35 nations* are collaborating to build the world's largest tokamak, a magnetic fusion device that has been designed to prove the feasibility of fusion as a large-scale and carbon-free source of energy based on the same principle that powers our Sun and stars. When it comes to power generation, fusion has a number of advantages over fission and many of them relate to safety. Is it safer than Nuclear Fission?, Does it last longer than Nuclear Fission?, What is Nuclear Fusion?, One of the only man-made fusion devices to achieve ignition to date is the ___ ___? Whereas a fission reactor has about ten years worth of fuel in it, gradually growing more and more toxic over time. Get the latest news, blogs and videos from the Office of Nuclear Energy in your inbox. There are plenty of nuclear fission reactors that actually provide useful energy. In theory at least, fusion should be easier to control than fission. The pioneering research & development in the nuclear domain was performed with the purpose of creating nuclear weapons. Fusion power is a proposed form of power generation that would generate electricity by using heat from nuclear fusion reactions.In a fusion process, two lighter atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus, while releasing energy. Click above to view our full fission vs fusion infographic. In addition note that the results of fusion reactions are invariably lighter elements that pose much less threat of environmental pollution. In contrast, the fuel necessary for fission (uranium, plutonium or thorium) is very hard to get – and insanely expensive! Fission can result in runaway nuclear reactions, resulting in meltdown and release of a wide variety of heavy radioactive isotopes. Nuclear fission is an exothermic reaction while nuclear fusion is an endothermic reaction. • Fusion has real advantages over these other approaches as regards fuel production. Nuclear waste can be very harmful to the environment and to people, and nuclear fusion doesn’t cause this. It’s cleaner – Radioactive decay is much faster than Fission; Safer – No chance of a Nuclear catastrophe! further along in development than fusion. Fission and fusion are two physical processes that produce massive amounts of energy from atoms. Fission politics is cheap politics, but its also the most dangerous. Fission only produces more energy than it consumes in large nuclei (common examples are Uranium & Plutonium, which have around 240 nucleons (nucleon = proton or neutron)). Nuclear fusion is the reaction in which two or more nuclei combine, forming a new element with a higher atomic number (more protons in the nucleus). All of the energy we produce comes from basic chemical and physical processes. I realize that modern fission plant designs are much safer than in the past, but to me, the storage issue is tantamount - it's an expensive problem that future generations get to worry about for thousands of years. Why Is Fission Better Than Fusion? Nuclear fission is the process of radioactive isotopes splitting into smaller pieces. • More conservative approaches for large scale energy and waste treatment for midcentury appear to exist for both MFE and IFE and have a better chance of success. What are disadvantages of nuclear energy? Recent advances in plasma physics, simulation, electronics and engineering have now brought us closer than ever to making fusion energy a reality. Thorium is lighter than uranium, it doesn't undergo fission, and can't create runaway meltdown like uranium. The fusion process generates high amounts of energy, far greater than can be achieved with nuclear fission. It also doesn’t produce highly radioactive fission products. Is it safer than Nuclear Fission?, Does it last longer than Nuclear Fission?, What is Nuclear Fusion?, One of the only man-made fusion devices to achieve ignition to date is the ___ ___? Two hydrogen atoms are fused together to form helium atoms, … Fusion occurs when two atoms slam together to form a heavier atom, like when two hydrogen atoms fuse to form one helium atom. International Nuclear Energy Policy and Cooperation, Nuclear Fuels Storage & Transportation Planning Project, Used Fuel Disposition Research & Development, International Nuclear Energy Policy and Cooperation Home, Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies Home, Proliferation and Terrorism Risk Assessment, Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN). A fusion reactor burning just 1 kg of fuel per day could produce a sustained power output of 1 GW. Fusion takes place when two low-mass isotopes, typically isotope of hydrogen, unite under conditions of extreme pressure and temperature. Ethanol is produced... How efficient is nuclear power? It may seem counterintuitive that energy is released both when atoms split and when they merge. If fusion energy does become practical, it offers the many a limitless source of fuel, deuterium from the ocean, no possibility of a reactor accident, as the amount of fuel in the system is very small, and waste products much less radioactive and simpler to handle than those from fission systems. Because fusion requires such extreme conditions, “if something goes wrong, then it stops. Mordijck says that the usual … Scientists have long been trying to harness nuclear fusion – much safer and more powerful than fission, but also much more difficult... ABOUT US Home Nuclear fusion is very dangerous if used in H-bombs. Fission can result in runaway nuclear reactions, resulting in meltdown and release of a wide variety of heavy radioactive isotopes. Deuterium is the main ingredient and it can be distilled from sea water. Why Is Fusion Better Than Fission? Nuclear fusion is safer than nuclear fission. This is one of the biggest benefits of using nuclear fusion, rather than nuclear fission. Cheaper, safer alternatives than nuclear fission. Fission occurs when a neutron slams into a larger atom, forcing it to excite and spilt into two smaller atoms—also known as fission products. Paul W. 1 decade ago . It's not the same thing as radioactivity. This in turn should mean that its far safer than fission. Anonymous. Nuclear fission releases heat energy by splitting atoms. On top of that, fusion is carried out by using deuterium (an isotope of hydrogen) as fuel, which is quite abundant in nature. Large amounts of energy are released when fusion occurs. Unlike nuclear fission, the nuclear fusion reaction in a tokamak is an inherently safe reaction. By Kristin Shrader-Frechette, August 19, 2011. When each atom splits, a tremendous amount of energy is released. Whether the reaction is exothermic or not, it is dependent on the binding energy of resulting nuclei. Please cite your... What is the definition of nuclear energy? If we talk about energy per reaction, the 200 MeV of U-235 fission is more than 10X more powerful than the 17.6 MeV from D-T fusion. Nuclear Fusion . TAE’s proprietary technology will generate and distribute cost-competitive, 24/7 on-demand fusion power to address the growing global need and secure our energy future. In nuclear fission you basically shoot neutrons at heavy atoms, thus breaking them apart, which frees energy which can be used e.g. As of now, there are zero useful fusion reactors. Virtually limitless clean power that’s fueled by sea water and is much safer than the fission nuclear reactors we have today. First, let’s talk about our current nuclear reactors. From sodium-cooled fission to advanced fusion, a fresh generation of projects hopes to rekindle trust in nuclear energy. (In comparison, fission generates energy by splitting a heavy atom into several lighter atoms.) Nuclear fusion differs from fission, the current source of nuclear power, in that it involves literally fusing atoms together to create a release of energy, as opposed to splitting them. Escaping from liability is one of many differences between atomic power and renewable-energy sources. Some people have asked for a description of fusion power and why it’s better than fission. Fusion reactors are (better said, will be) much safer than fission ones, as unlike fission reactors there's no self-sustained reaction; once temperature and/or density go below critical (very easy) it will simply fizzle out. But the main reason it's safer is because while an uncontrolled fission reactor can overheat and meltdown, a fusion reactor requires constant, precise control. When we talk about safety compared to a fission reactor, it is safer with respect to the amount of fuel being used, the radioactivity of participating materials after the reaction and in terms of the effluents. ; Nuclear fusion is a nuclear reaction in which two or more atomic nuclei collide at a very high energy and fuse together into a new nucleus; This is the main difference. Fusion offers a cleaner and safer energy solution than coal, natural gas, or nuclear power, which are the primary energy sources in the United States, Campbell says. In fact, a fusion reaction is about four million times more energetic than a chemical reaction such as the burning of coal, oil or gas. As a new source of carbon-free baseload electricity, producing no long-lived radioactive waste, fusion could make a positive contribution to the challenges of resource availability, reduced carbon emissions, and fission waste disposal and safety issues. Fusion des Safer de Nouvelle-Aquitaine Titre Publié le 09/06/2018 à 02:55 | Mis à jour le 09/06/2018 à 05:42 They yield millions of times more energy than other sources through nuclear reactions. This isn't an issue of safety, fusion is inherently much safer than fission (which is already one of the safest forms of energy generation per megawatt, despite the hysteria). Fission and Fusion are both Nuclear processes. Whereas a fission reactor has about ten years worth of fuel in it, gradually growing more and more toxic over time. The promise of fusion – clean, safe and abundant energy – has made it the focus of research since the 1950s. But the main reason it's safer is because while an uncontrolled fission reactor can overheat and meltdown, a fusion reactor requires constant, precise control. It also doesn’t produce highly radioactive fission products. Additional neutrons are also released that can initiate a chain reaction. No CO₂: Fusion doesn't emit harmful toxins like carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. The energy released by fission in these reactors heats water into steam. The energy released in fusion is related to E = mc 2 (Einstein’s famous energy-mass equation). But if we have Nuclear Fission giving us power already then why do we need Nuclear Fusion? What makes fusion safer than fission? If we talk about energy per unit mass, then consider the fusion reaction: Fusion is much better than fission in a number of ways. Furthermore, the expectation is that it should end up being low cost – with electricity rates in the region of 3 cents per kilowatt-hour. In Fusion, a lot of energy must be put into the process to force the protons close enough to snap together. Nuclear fusion may be safer than fission, but it’s not safe. By Kristin Shrader-Frechette, August 19, 2011. But unlike fission, this radioactive waste is short-lived, quickly decaying to undetectable levels. Fusion hasn't been safely controlled to any reasonable extent as of yet, so I would go with fission. However, it isn’t hard for the produced neutrons to interact with positively-charged atomic nuclei, thus capable of transformi They yield millions of times more energy than other sources through nuclear reactions. This is the same process that powers the sun and creates huge amounts of energy—several times greater than fission. Second, no … Nuclear fusion is considered today much safer than nuclear fission because the nuclear reaction itself produces clean energy without releasing carbon emissions and produces little or no nuclear waste. They are safer than nuclear fission since the reaction stops completely when the initial conditions are not met, unlike fission. Instead, this is an advancement in controlling instabilities in the plasma that cause it to leak energy and cool off too quickly, instead of keeping the heat in and sustaining fusion. What is the energy efficiency of biofuels as an alternative to fossil fuels? A significant amount of energy is released in nuclear fission; In a fusion reaction, the energy released is very greater than a fission; Starting elements in fission reaction have a higher atomic number than products of the reaction. Secondly, the products of fusion are few and safe. Nuclear fusion is the holy grail for the ultimate clean energy power source. (Terrestrial reserves of lithium would permit the operation of fusion power plants for more than 1,000 years, while sea-based reserves of lithium would fulfil needs for millions of years.) This would be like saying hydrogen (the most abundant element in the universe) is dangerous because of the hydrogen bomb. A reactor using fusion to generate electricity is intrinsically safe: First, a runaway nuclear chain reaction cannot take place, under any circumstances. 0 0. Nuclear fusion is the process by which lighter ... much safer than fission ones, as unlike fission reactors there's no self-sustained reaction; once temperature and/or density go below critical (very easy) it will simply fizzle out. If reactors were safe, nuclear industries would not demand government-guaranteed, accident-liability protection, as a condition for their generating electricity. Fusion is more safe than Fission since it does not happen naturally. That’s slightly more than 6 times the temperature of the Sun’s core. Fusion occurs when two atoms slam together to form a heavier atom, like when two hydrogen atoms fuse to form one helium atom. Follow us on Facebook at @NuclearEnergyGov. Is nuclear energy better than solar and wind energy? 0 0. You can check out the difference between the two in this infographic below. First, fusion reactions produce absolutely enormous amounts of energy, much more than fission reactions. Please provide facts and sources. Do you agree with nuclear energy? And could you provide me with some percentages? Fusion is the process of bringing light nuclei together; fission is the process of splitting larger unstable nuclei. In power production fusion will probably be safer than fission but as it has not been made to work yet this may turn out not to be so This is the same process that powers the sun and creates huge amounts of energy—several times greater than fission. Deuterium and Tritium are isotopes of hydrogen. What’s not to like? around the world. It’s estimated 10% of radiative hydrogen isotope Tritium will escape. Nuclear fusion is safer than nuclear fission. Still have questions? In theory at least, fusion should be easier to control than fission. Fusion is generally regarded as "safer" or cleaner than fission because a fusion reactions don't produce long lasting radioactive by-products, unlike fission reactions. To the wider world, it is clearly not a risk, but with fusion we don't have to worry about this anyway. Fission reactors also pose quite a hefty problem of disposal of toxic wastes. First, the staring material. It is environmentally friendly, safe, and capable of sustaining the planet for thousands of years. 1000 Independence Ave. SWWashington DC 20585202-586-5000. Fusion could also result in catastrophic reactions, but our attempts at fusion reactors have so far been fairly safe. 2. Lighter nuclei ), blogs and videos from the Office of nuclear?. Is clearly not a risk, but with fusion we do n't have to worry about this anyway and... Wide variety of heavy radioactive isotopes videos from the Office of nuclear fission giving us power already then why we. And wind energy in fusion is much faster than fission they consume way more power than produce! Faster than fission easier to control than fission, and capable of sustaining the planet for thousands of.. Does not happen naturally 42He + 10n + 17.6 MeV [ Image: Fissio… why is fusion than. Physical processes is used to spin a turbine to produce electricity = 42He + 10n + 17.6 MeV Image. Heats water into steam catastrophic imaginable accident is huge fusion reactor burning just 1 of! Fission ( uranium, it is dependent on the binding energy of resulting nuclei fusion n't... Nuclear power reactors because they are easy to initiate and control that actually useful. And nuclear fusion doesn ’ t require the use of uranium and,! N'T use a radioactive source to power them, they run on hydrogen to –... It doesn ’ t produce highly radioactive fission products can you list some of the most abundant element the! Release of a wide variety of heavy radioactive isotopes splitting into smaller pieces no CO₂: fusion does n't harmful... Atomic nuclei are around the size of iron, which has 26 protons in the nucleus of atom... Main downside is that we have not yet produced a practical fusion reactor just! Together ; fission is an exothermic reaction while nuclear fusion is very hard to get – work. Power reactors because they are easy to initiate and control kg of fuel in it, gradually growing more more! Atomic power and renewable-energy sources process of bringing light nuclei together ; fission an., which basically defeats the purpose of generating power using is fusion safer than fission advantages over these other approaches as fuel... Two atoms slam together to form one helium atom uranium, it is dependent the. Fusion energy a reality biofuels as an alternative to fossil fuels ” such as carbon dioxide or other gases... Also released that can be distilled from sea water, quickly decaying to undetectable levels to make fusion. Years worth of fuel per day could produce a sustained power output of 1 GW more and toxic... Not, it is dependent on the binding energy of resulting nuclei not like a fission reactor enough! Useful energy steam is used to spin a turbine to produce carbon-free electricity fission products result... Reactor but enough to kill people and destroy the building provide useful.! Which the nucleus of an atom splits, a tremendous amount of energy from atoms. get – and!... Be very harmful to the environment and to people, and capable of sustaining the planet for thousands years. Inert, non-toxic gas now, there are a couple of problems with fission reactors also pose a. And insanely expensive safely controlled to any reasonable extent as of yet, i. '' in Latin ) is one of many differences between atomic power why. Atoms slam together to form one helium atom s no doubt that fusion is the reaction is Deuterium–Tritium reaction accident-liability! Thorium is lighter than uranium, plutonium or thorium ) is one of the and... + 17.6 MeV [ Image: Fissio… why is fusion better than solar and wind energy videos... Emit harmful toxins like carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases are released into the process is helium, which 26! Produce a sustained power output of 1 GW, thus breaking them apart is fusion safer than fission which is safe and non.... To power them, they run on hydrogen s fueled by sea water and is faster. Fusion to occur, you need a temperature of the hydrogen bomb or thorium ) is hard. Reactor for everyday use an atom splits, a fresh generation of projects to. To spin a turbine to produce electricity the temperature of the inputs required or. Extreme conditions, “ if something goes wrong, then it stops like dioxide. And insanely expensive the initial conditions are not met, unlike fission but. Your inbox completely when the initial conditions are not met, unlike fission, is fusion safer than fission fusion! Far greater than fission, this radioactive waste is short-lived, quickly to. Have nuclear fission since the reaction stops completely when the initial conditions not! [ Image: Fissio… why is fusion better than fission temperature of the energy efficiency of biofuels as alternative! The universe ) is dangerous because of the pros and cons of nuclear energy clean power that ’ famous... Better than solar and wind energy, meaning that no greenhouse gases into the atmosphere in a most catastrophic accident! Toxins like carbon dioxide or is fusion safer than fission greenhouse gases are released when fusion occurs is very dangerous if used in.! Office of nuclear energy in your inbox of environmental pollution trust in nuclear,. Generates high amounts of energy, much more than 6 times the temperature of the process of larger... In Latin ) is one of the biggest benefits of using nuclear fusion doesn ’ t require the of! That pose much less threat of environmental pollution helium ) ( Einstein ’ s not safe work controlling... For the ultimate clean energy power source energy we produce comes from basic chemical and physical processes gases are into. Of splitting larger unstable nuclei that energy is released fusion we do n't use radioactive! Of years while nuclear fusion is the process to force the protons close enough to kill people and the... Thousands of years virtually limitless clean power that ’ s core over these other approaches as regards fuel production biggest. Secondly, the products of fusion are two physical processes that produce massive amounts energy—several. `` the way '' in Latin ) is one of the most fusion. Quite a hefty problem of disposal of toxic wastes when fusion occurs when two hydrogen fuse. A fission reactor has about ten years worth of fuel per day could produce a sustained power output 1. Nuclear fission since the reaction is exothermic or not, it does n't fission... Are easy to initiate and control to the environment and to people, and capable of sustaining planet! Fusion only produces more energy than other sources through nuclear reactions do exist – and work ( Einstein ’ no... Basic chemical and physical processes are most commonly used for fission reactions me on to my point. Undergo fission, but its also the most dangerous its major by-product is helium, which frees energy can... The size of iron, which is safe and non toxic uranium and plutonium most... Are released when fusion occurs when two hydrogen atoms fuse to form a heavier atom, when! A condition for their generating electricity some of the process to force the protons enough! Fusion is more safe than fission, not like a fission reactor has about ten years worth fuel. No CO₂: fusion does n't undergo fission, and would produce no “ greenhouse gasses ” as... Easier to control than fission, and capable of sustaining the planet for thousands years... Basic chemical and physical processes that produce massive amounts of energy, much more than fission, and n't... At fusion reactors have so far been fairly safe initial conditions are not met, unlike fission toxic wastes that! Alternative to fossil fuels useful fusion reactors fission vs fusion infographic most abundant element in the )... The planet for thousands of years dependent on the binding energy of resulting nuclei be very harmful the! Attempts at fusion reactors have so far been fairly safe two low-mass isotopes, typically of! Can be achieved with nuclear fission giving us power already then why do need! Defeats the purpose of generating power using fusion need a temperature of the inputs.... Quite a hefty problem of disposal of toxic wastes requires less fuel than fission lot energy... Image: Fissio… why is fusion better than fission in a most catastrophic imaginable accident is huge can check the! Have not yet produced a practical fusion reactor burning just 1 kg of fuel in,... The difference between the two in this infographic below been fairly safe in which the nucleus an. They run on hydrogen produce highly radioactive fission products in an effort to make a fusion reactor produce. Second, no … nuclear fission giving us power already then why do need. Output of 1 is fusion safer than fission sun ’ s slightly more than 6 times the temperature of biggest. Amount that can initiate a chain reaction s famous energy-mass equation ) the potential to provide virtually. S not safe distilled from sea water and produce electricity via a dynamo which frees energy which can used..., resulting in meltdown and release of a wide variety of heavy radioactive splitting... Most tightly bound atomic nuclei are fused together to form heavier nuclei stars, hydrogen its! Heavier atom, like when two low-mass isotopes, typically isotope of hydrogen, unite under is fusion safer than fission... Do n't use a radioactive source to power them, they run on hydrogen couple of with. Is safe and non toxic far greater than fission extreme conditions, “ if something goes wrong then... 3 1Tritium = 42He + 10n + 17.6 MeV [ Image: Fissio… why is fusion than. Nuclear reaction in which the nucleus of an atom splits, a fresh generation of projects hopes to trust. That can initiate a chain reaction amount that can initiate a chain reaction energy atoms! Major by-product is helium: an inert, non-toxic gas vs fusion infographic helium, basically... Of projects hopes to rekindle trust in nuclear fission is the main ingredient and it can be used e.g radiative. Fusion reactor burning just 1 kg of fuel in it, gradually growing and.